[exim-cvs] cvs commit: exim/exim-doc/doc-misc WishList exim…

Página Inicial
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: Philip Hazel
Data:  
Para: exim-cvs
Assunto: [exim-cvs] cvs commit: exim/exim-doc/doc-misc WishList exim/exim-doc/doc-src FAQ.src
ph10 2005/05/06 09:28:16 BST

  Modified files:
    exim-doc/doc-misc    WishList 
    exim-doc/doc-src     FAQ.src 
  Log:
  (1) New Wish. (2) Typo and tabs in FAQ source.


  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.31      +7 -1      exim/exim-doc/doc-misc/WishList
  1.7       +43 -43    exim/exim-doc/doc-src/FAQ.src


  Index: WishList
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-doc/doc-misc/WishList,v
  retrieving revision 1.30
  retrieving revision 1.31
  diff -u -r1.30 -r1.31
  --- WishList    3 May 2005 08:38:13 -0000    1.30
  +++ WishList    6 May 2005 08:28:16 -0000    1.31
  @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
  -$Cambridge: exim/exim-doc/doc-misc/WishList,v 1.30 2005/05/03 08:38:13 ph10 Exp $
  +$Cambridge: exim/exim-doc/doc-misc/WishList,v 1.31 2005/05/06 08:28:16 ph10 Exp $


EXIM 4 WISH LIST
----------------
@@ -1911,5 +1911,11 @@
This is bugzilla #17. The idea is to have something like queue_only_load that
triggers on a shortage of main memory.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- HWM 326 ------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+(327) 06-May-05 ? Break delay if connection drops
+
+Currently, "delay=5m" (e.g.) waits for 5 minutes. If we can detect that the
+connection has died in the meantime, it would make sense to break the delay.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+--- HWM 327 ------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------- End of WishList ---------------------------------

  Index: FAQ.src
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-doc/doc-src/FAQ.src,v
  retrieving revision 1.6
  retrieving revision 1.7
  diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
  --- FAQ.src    15 Feb 2005 09:27:45 -0000    1.6
  +++ FAQ.src    6 May 2005 08:28:16 -0000    1.7
  @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
  -## $Cambridge: exim/exim-doc/doc-src/FAQ.src,v 1.6 2005/02/15 09:27:45 ph10 Exp $
  +## $Cambridge: exim/exim-doc/doc-src/FAQ.src,v 1.7 2005/05/06 08:28:16 ph10 Exp $
   ##
   ## This file is processed by Perl scripts to produce an ASCII and an HTML
   ## version. Lines starting with ## are omitted. The markup used with paragraphs
  @@ -371,11 +371,11 @@


          You can test the link using pings of large packets and see what works:


  -==>     ping -s host 2048
  +==>      ping -s host 2048


          Try reducing the MTU on the sending host:


  -==>     ifconfig le0 mtu 1300
  +==>      ifconfig le0 mtu 1300


          Alternatively, you can reduce the size of the buffer Exim uses for SMTP
          output by putting something like
  @@ -743,7 +743,7 @@
              second solution is used, users can empty their mailboxes by updating
              them, but cannot delete them.


  -       If your problem involves mail to \/root/\, see also Q0507.
  +       If your problem involves mail to \/root/\, see also Q0039.



   Q0037: I am experiencing mailbox locking problems with Sun's \"mailtool"\ used
  @@ -1322,7 +1322,7 @@
          by a \"mail.info"\ descriptor).
          Test this by running the command:


  -==>     logger -p mail.notice test
  +==>      logger -p mail.notice test


          and seeing which logs it goes into. From Exim release 4.31 it is
          possible to disable the rejectlog by setting \write_rejectlog\ false.
  @@ -1811,9 +1811,9 @@
          ensure that this happens throughout the build, it's best to export it in
          your environment:


  -==>     MAKEFLAGS='-B'
  -     export MAKEFLAGS
  -     make
  +==>      MAKEFLAGS='-B'
  +         export MAKEFLAGS
  +          make



   Q0116: I have tried to build Exim with Berkeley DB 3 and 4, but I always get
  @@ -2478,25 +2478,25 @@
   ==>      # Don't allow domains whose single MX (or A) record is a
            # "special-use IPv4 address", as listed in RFC 3330.
            ignore_target_hosts = \
  -           # Hosts on "this network"; RFC 1700 (page 4) states that these
  -           # are only allowed as source addresses
  -           0.0.0.0/8 : \
  -           # Private networks, RFC 1918
  -           10.0.0.0/8 : 172.16.0.0/12 : 192.168.0.0/16 : \
  -           # Internet host loopback address, RFC 1700 (page 5)
  -           127.0.0.0/8 : \
  -           # "Link local" block
  -           169.254.0.0/16 : \
  -           # "TEST-NET" - should not appear on the public Internet
  -           192.0.2.0/24 : \
  -           # 6to4 relay anycast addresses, RFC 3068
  -           192.88.99.0/24 : \
  -           # Network interconnect device benchmark testing, RFC 2544
  -           198.18.0.0/15 : \
  -           # Multicast addresses, RFC 3171
  -           224.0.0.0/4 : \
  -           # Reserved for future use, RFC 1700 (page 4)
  -           240.0.0.0/4
  +         # Hosts on "this network"; RFC 1700 (page 4) states that these
  +         # are only allowed as source addresses
  +         0.0.0.0/8 : \
  +         # Private networks, RFC 1918
  +         10.0.0.0/8 : 172.16.0.0/12 : 192.168.0.0/16 : \
  +         # Internet host loopback address, RFC 1700 (page 5)
  +         127.0.0.0/8 : \
  +         # "Link local" block
  +         169.254.0.0/16 : \
  +         # "TEST-NET" - should not appear on the public Internet
  +         192.0.2.0/24 : \
  +         # 6to4 relay anycast addresses, RFC 3068
  +         192.88.99.0/24 : \
  +         # Network interconnect device benchmark testing, RFC 2544
  +         198.18.0.0/15 : \
  +         # Multicast addresses, RFC 3171
  +         224.0.0.0/4 : \
  +         # Reserved for future use, RFC 1700 (page 4)
  +         240.0.0.0/4



   Q0320: How can I arrange for all mail to \*user@???*\ to be forwarded
  @@ -3672,10 +3672,10 @@
          transport could be:


   ==>      local_delivery_mbx:
  -       driver = pipe
  -       command = /usr/local/bin/tmail $local_part
  -       user = exim
  -       current_directory = /
  +           driver = pipe
  +           command = /usr/local/bin/tmail $local_part
  +           user = exim
  +           current_directory = /
              use_crlf
              message_prefix =


  @@ -4807,10 +4807,10 @@
          do not block legitimate mail. With that proviso, you can do it using
          something like this in an ACL:


  -==>     drop  message = HELO doesn't look like a hostname
  -           log_message = Not a hostname
  -           condition = ${if match{$sender_helo_name} \
  -                {\N^[^.].*\.[^.]+$\N}{no}{yes}}
  +==>      drop  message = HELO doesn't look like a hostname
  +               log_message = Not a hostname
  +               condition = ${if match{$sender_helo_name} \
  +                           {\N^[^.].*\.[^.]+$\N}{no}{yes}}


          This means: Drop the HELO unless it contains a dot somewhere in the HELO
          string, but the string may not begin or end with a dot. Thus, the
  @@ -5003,8 +5003,8 @@
          names, but if mail comes in for an upper case login name, it doesn't
          get rewritten.


  -==>     *@my.domain     ${lookup{$1}dbm{/usr/lib/exim/longforms}\
  -             {$value}fail}@??? bcfrtFT
  +==>      *@my.domain   ${lookup{$1}dbm{/usr/lib/exim/longforms}\
  +                        {$value}fail}@??? bcfrtFT


          The longforms database has entries of the form:


  @@ -5020,11 +5020,11 @@
          are rewriting. If you are rewriting recipient addresses for your local
          domain, you can do:


  -==>     *@dom.ain  ${lookup{$1}dbm{/wher/ever}{$value}{failaddr}}  Ehq
  +==>      *@dom.ain  ${lookup{$1}dbm{/wher/ever}{$value}{failaddr}}  Ehq


          and in your alias file put something like


  -==>     failaddr:   :fail: Rewriting failed
  +==>      failaddr:   :fail: Rewriting failed


          This fails a single recipient - others are processed independently.


  @@ -5773,8 +5773,8 @@
              encrypt the user/site/leaf certificate. If this isn't acceptable,
              you seem to be able to strip out the passphrase as follows:


  -==>         openssl rsa -in user.key -our user.key.new
  -         mv user.key.new
  +==>          openssl rsa -in user.key -our user.key.new
  +             mv user.key.new


              This should be done immediately after \(user.key)\ is created.


  @@ -6625,13 +6625,13 @@
   ==>      # Now System is up, Modify kernel parameters for max open etc.


   ==>      if [ -f /proc/sys/kernel/file-max ]; then
  -         echo 16384 >> /proc/sys/kernel/file-max
  +           echo 16384 >> /proc/sys/kernel/file-max
            fi
            if [ -f /proc/sys/kernel/inode-max ]; then
  -         echo 24576 >> /proc/sys/kernel/inode-max
  +           echo 24576 >> /proc/sys/kernel/inode-max
            fi
            if [ -f /proc/sys/kernel/file-nr ]; then
  -         echo 2160 >> /proc/sys/kernel/file-nr
  +           echo 2160 >> /proc/sys/kernel/file-nr
            fi


          By echoing the value you want for file-max to the file \(file-max)\ etc.,