On Wed, 4 May 2005, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> Did I just imagine the bit where Tony implemented CSA? I can't even find
> any reference to it in my copy of the list archives.
The latest version of the patch (against the current CVS) is linked below.
I don't know of any problems with it, and it would be nice to see it in
4.51. I'm running it in production at the moment and it has actually
triggered a few times, though the resulting list of domains that have
deployed CSA offer few surprises, e.g.
2005-04-27 04:49:10 +0100 H=(infradead.org) [219.133.170.242]:2314 I=[131.111.8.149]:25 F=<hch@???> rejected RCPT <bill@???>: client SMTP authorization failed (host name not authorized)
2005-04-27 04:49:25 +0100 H=(infradead.org) [219.133.170.242]:1335 I=[131.111.8.149]:25 F=<hch@???> rejected RCPT <bill@???>: client SMTP authorization failed (host name not authorized)
2005-04-28 12:26:14 +0100 H=(iecc.com) [203.200.200.67]:38636 I=[131.111.8.140]:25 F=<compilers@???> rejected RCPT <dot@???>: client SMTP authorization failed (host name not authorized)
http://www.cus.cam.ac.uk/~fanf2/hermes/doc/antiforgery/exim-csa.2c.patch
Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???>
http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
