Re: [exim] greylisting issue

David Woodhouse wrote:

>On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 23:12 +0100, Daniel Watts wrote:
>
>
>>>However, if this is true, the sender of that mail is going to lose some
>>>anyway, when it tries to send to systems which genuinely have a transient
>>>error.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>although we are now guarateeing they'll lose their mail every time =)
>>
>>
>
>That's a good thing. The first step in solving a problem is to reliably
>be able to reproduce it.
>
>
heh so greylisting should add "fixing the world's mailservers" to it's
mission objective now?