Re: [exim] Any Joe Job advice?

Mark Moseley wrote:
> <snip>
>
>>BTW, SES could allow you to
>>better control joe-jobs, altought everyday we find more mailers
>>not using a null-envelope sender for bounces, specially for
>>virus warnings and other notifications.
>
> </snip>
>
> Yeah, what the heck is up with that? I've been scouring logs today
> trying to find other non-null sender bounces and there's a lot.
> Luckily most are some variant of postmaster or mailer-daemon, but who
> are these maniacs writing MTAs (or possibly configuring) that don't
> use a null sender for bounces. What a great way to create collateral
> spam.

Often, Microsoft.

You aren't surprised, I trust?

- Jeremy