> -----Original Message-----
> From: exim-users-bounces@???
> [mailto:exim-users-bounces@exim.org] On Behalf Of David Woodhouse
> Sent: 12 April 2005 07:44
> To: Mark Moseley
> Cc: exim-users@???
> Subject: Re: [exim] Any Joe Job advice?
>
<SNIP>
> For rejecting bounces to joe-jobs, use SES or BATV. If you
<SNIP>
I was wondering, how does something like BATV affect the end users of
mail
Services. Could I implement this at a server level without my users
noticing
That their outbound envelopes were being rewritten?
Is it even a good idea to do this? BATV seems like the simplest, and
least
Anti-social way of guaranteeing that a message is a legitimate bounce,
but
Surely if this was the case it would already have much wider acceptance?
What
Are the the reasons not to use it?
Thanks for the help,
Richard
---------------------------------------------------
This email from dns has been validated by dnsMSS Managed Email Security and is free from all known viruses.
For further information contact email-integrity@???
