Re: [exim] message / log_message from sub ACLs

Pàgina inicial
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: Tony Finch
Data:  
A: Chris Edwards
CC: exim-users
Assumpte: Re: [exim] message / log_message from sub ACLs
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Chris Edwards wrote:
>
> then is there any way to get at the "message" or the "log_message" setup by
> whichever acl_check_spam statement denied ?


It should "just work" (it does for me). You might get a better result if
you put any message and log_message modifiers immediately after the ACL
verb instead of after all the conditions. The evaluation order of ACLs is
sometimes confusing, and I've found this rule of thumb helps to avoid
problems.

Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}