Re: [exim] Sender callouts

Wakko Warner wrote:
> Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > Wakko Warner wrote:
> > > Won't go over too well if the sender's server uses SPF. It's also possib
le
> > > the site won't accept the sender if it's a local domain and not
> > > authenticated.
> >
> > Hmm, I hadn't thought of that. I haven't seen it fail that way
> > yet. Still, the callout will fail and their mail won't be accepted
> > which is no different to the current situation except that the
> > number of FP callout rejections is reduced. If I can't at least
> > verify that you would accept mail from me in return, I won't accept
> > from you. Maybe that's too bloody minded and I'll be subdued by
> > time and experience.
>
> Speaking of this, my server doesn't allow emails through that don't have a
> message-id header. Your MUA/MTA is not adding this header. There are
> others that do this as well.

I saw that, I thought that exim did add this header by default.
Perhaps it stopped doing so between 3.3x and 4.50 which was the
jump my workstation made last week.

Ian

--
Ian Freislich