Re: [exim] Sender callouts

Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Wakko Warner wrote:
> > Won't go over too well if the sender's server uses SPF. It's also possible
> > the site won't accept the sender if it's a local domain and not
> > authenticated.
>
> Hmm, I hadn't thought of that. I haven't seen it fail that way
> yet. Still, the callout will fail and their mail won't be accepted
> which is no different to the current situation except that the
> number of FP callout rejections is reduced. If I can't at least
> verify that you would accept mail from me in return, I won't accept
> from you. Maybe that's too bloody minded and I'll be subdued by
> time and experience.

Speaking of this, my server doesn't allow emails through that don't have a
message-id header. Your MUA/MTA is not adding this header. There are
others that do this as well.

--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals