Jakob Hirsch wrote:
>
>> condition = \
>> "${if and { {!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} \
>
> Any spam message with this header will go through unchecked.
You know, thanks for pointing that out. I can't even remember anymore
why that was added, it might be an old vestige of DSPAM 2.x + SA 2.x
that I had header removal/adding being done. It doesn't exist anymore in
anything I can see, I'll whack it. Thanks.
>> {!eq {$received_protocol}{asmtp}} \
>
> {!def:authenticated_id}
Would you rate this as better, worse, or the same level as:
{!eq {$received_protocol}{esmtpa}} \
{!eq {$received_protocol}{esmtpsa}} \
Gut instinct says they're about even with doing the same thing, no
benefit one way or the other. (I just had the 'asmtp' wrong, it changed
in 4.42)
-te
--
Troy Engel | Systems Engineer
Fluid, Inc |
http://www.fluid.com
