Autor: Jakob Hirsch Datum: To: 'Exim-users' Betreff: Re: [exim] Exim server behind NAT router (and HELO)
Matt Fretwell wrote:
> If, according to the RFC's, a client MUST helo with a valid hostname, and
> doesn't, why should the reference to 'must not refuse to accept', (or
> something similiar), be adhered to?
because the old "be strict when sending and tolerant when receiving"
principle was really not invented in vain.
> If someone who is trying to connect to our system(s) can't be arsed
> adhering to the RFC's, why should we pay any gorm to the RFC's?