--On March 15, 2005 19:27:48 +0000 Tony Finch <dot@???> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>>
>> The single process method below will work, but I've found it more
>> convenient to use a separate process for the alternate ports.
>>
>> I find that my configuration for the alternate ports is much simpler
>> than for port 25. As a result, I like to keep the config files separate.
>
> You can keep the ACLs for the different ports separate but in the same
> configuration file by making the ACL name depend on the port number. This
> allows you to share the routeing configuration.
That's true, but our routeing is different, too.
I also prefer to have two simple(r) configurations files than one more
complex one.
> http://www.cus.cam.ac.uk/~fanf2/hermes/doc/talks/2005-02-eximconf/
>
> Tony.
> --
> <fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
> N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
> \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
--
Ian Eiloart
Servers Team
Sussex University ITS
