On 15 Mar 2005 at 17:54, Marcos Monge wrote about
"[exim] bcc field":
| I have a special alias that deliver the mail to a script to some
| special task usint a | pipe in /etc/aliases.
|
| The problem is that when the original email sent to exim via smtp,
| have users in the bcc field, Exim don't pass the header Bcc in the
| mail to the script.
I find it *very* unlikely that exim is stripping the BCC header, or
any other header, from a message received via SMTP. That is, unless
you are telling it to via a headers_remove statement.
What is your evidence for that? Specifically, how have you
demonstrated that the BCC header was included in the message data in
the first place? Remember that MUAs will include a BCC header only
in the copy of a message to be delivered to the BCC recipients, if at
all. To: and Cc: recipients are not allowed to see a BCC header.
- Fred