Re: [exim] exim 4.4 authentication

On 3/14/2005 3:20, "Colm MacCarthaigh" <colm.maccarthaigh@???> wrote:

> By creating this distinction for outgoing mail, and explaining that
> there is a higher likelyhood of the address used for unauthenticated
> mail ending up on an RBL, it effectively "taints" the unauthenticated
> service and can help people see the genuinely better service offering
> from the authenticated service.

We offer extra services for authenticated senders only. (I see an upcoming
need to adjust slightly how we do that.) That too is done in our mail
processing code, not in Exim.

--John