On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 12:15 -0500, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2005, at 11:34 AM, Tom Kistner wrote:
> > Or you set /defer_ok and it gets accepted anyway. :)
>
> I'm noting that, should I move to exiscan in the future (for spam
> checking, its doing a bunch of other stuff already for me. i just like
> the smtp time aspect of sa-exim)
You have lost me there. In what way is exiscan less "smtp time" than
sa-exim? I thought the major differences (other than the wider range of
exiscan) were that sa-exim allows you to do spamassassin header/body
rewrites, and the tar pitting support.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
