On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:30:09 +0000, Tony Finch <dot@???> wrote:
>On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Just out of curiosity, would you send the bounce to the envelope
>> sender of the message (which might be misconfigured on the client) or
>> to the e-mail address connected with the authenticated accoutn (which
>> might be an address that the user never reads)?
>
>Bounces always go to the return path, which should therefore ALWAYS be
>verified at SMTP time so that bounces can be delivered.
Verification doesn guarantee deliverability, but not that the address
generated is actually read.
>There's a slight bug in Exim's current control=submission implementation
>in that it doesn't force the return path to be the authenticated sender
>address, as it does for local submission via the command line.
There should be a possibility to switch that behavior off.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
