Re: [exim] proper vacation processing

Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Tony Finch
Date:  
À: Phil Chambers
CC: exim-users
Sujet: Re: [exim] proper vacation processing
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Phil Chambers wrote:
>
> In considering this problem I came to wonder if it is actually possible to do the
> job properly without using an exim filter. For example, I can't seet at the moment
> how I can check in a router if the recipients's e-mail address is in the To: or Cc:
> header.


You can use a condition on the router that sends addresses to the
autoreply transport, but it would be complicated and fiddly. Is there any
particular reason you don't want to use a filter to do vacation handling?

Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}