Re: [exim] [OT] SPF ranting

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MAxel Thimm at <-
 
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Tom Kistner
Date:  
To: exim-users
CC: Bill Hacker
Subject: Re: [exim] [OT] SPF ranting
Axel Thimm wrote:

> Just whether the change :spf_received: -> :at_start_rfc: is correct.

Yes. The new name isn't ideal either, but at least it does not relate to
SPF any more :)

What it should express is that the header is added at a position that
still conforms to RFC822/2822 but isn't at the bottom of the chain.

/tom


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [exim] At what point is the initial connect greeting sent?[exim] Re: Complex forwarding issue->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)