On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Marilyn Davis wrote:
>
> > > I don't immediately see how it works in the routers. Does it work the
> > > same as "verify = sender"? If I have a router with
> > > "verify_sender_only" set, will "verify = header_sender" go there?
> >
> > Ooops. Rather, if my router has: verify_sender = no, will
> > header_sender verification try that router?
>
> I had, in fact, (on a double-take) understood that that was what you
> were asking... the answer is "no".
>
> > Now I have a router just for verifying the envelope sender, and one
> > just for verifying recipients. I'd like to verify the header_sender
> > in an ACL but I want that to be another special router. Can I arrange
> > that?
>
> I'm afraid not.
Hmmm, no sweat. I think I can do it by manipulating acl_m?.
Thanks again.
Marilyn
>
> > When verify = header_sender is happening, if a Reply-To: address can't
> > be verified, will it then try to verify the From: address?
> >
> > I don't seem to find any info in the regular places.
>
> verify = header_sender/<options>
>
> This condition is relevant only in an ACL that is run after a message
> has been received, that is, in an ACL specified by "acl_smtp_data" or |
> "acl_not_smtp". It checks that there is a verifiable address in at least |
> one of the Sender:, Reply-To:, or From: header lines. Such an address is |
> loosely thought of as a 'sender' address (hence the name of the test). |
>
> (That's from the 4.50 manual.) So the answer is "yes".
>
>
--
