On Thursday 17 of February 2005 03:18, Fred Viles wrote:
> Not quite right. With one fix and a couple cosmetic improvements,
> that should be:
>
> bogus:
> driver = plaintext
> public_name = "\r\n250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN"
> server_prompts = User Name : Password
> server_condition = no
>
> The '\r' is needed for a correct <CR><LF> line ending, but there's no
> need for a fake mechanism name. This example also assumes you've
> implemented both PLAIN and LOGIN authenticators, at least. CRAM-MD5
> doesn't need to be listed on the broken AUTH line, even if you
> implement it, since the broken MUAs don't support it anyway (right?).
It is really amazing. I'm really impressed. Thanks a lot.
I can't just tell that somebody should change the MUA as far as it works with
any other ISP. In his eyes, my server is broken, not his Outlook Express.
--
.''`. Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA
: :' : mailto:Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl
`. `' mailto:dexter@debian.org
`-
