On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 09:44:52AM +0000, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
> > This is too complicated. I'll continue to talk about bugs when I mean
> > wishlist requests ;)
>
> When is a bug not a bug? When it's reported by Debian.
*sigh*
I'll try to adapt my forwarding script to put the bug^wticket severity
into the message subject in the future.
> OK. I will try to remember that when a Debian person says "bug" they
> don't necessarily mean it. I won't therefore give reports containing the
> word "bug" as much priority as I might have. That is, I won't look at
> them as urgently as I normally do.
I am pretty well aware that Debian is unpopular with exim upstream for
shipping ancient versions and for using a non-standard configuration
scheme since we need to be runnable out of the box. But I don't think
that it is a good idea to ignore bug reports coming from Debian.
Remember that we have found real bugs in the past. Please reconsider
this decision, which I am rather disappointed with.
<lengthy rant deleted to be rehashed over $BEVERAGE next week>
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835
