Re: [exim] Re: Bug in exim

On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 22:04, Philip Hazel wrote:
> My guess is that it is the combination of "unseen" and "one_time" that
> is doing this, because I recall previously doing some checking to ensure
> that "unseen" on its work works ok with deferred deliveries.
>
> > I won't be pursing this further as now I understand the original
> > cause, I can work around it. Thanks to all those who replied to
> > my original post.
>
> I am glad you can work around it, because I think this is too tricky an
> area to consider making any changes for the forthcoming 4.50 release.
> However, I have noted the problem, and in due course I will take a look
> and see what can be done about it, even if it has to be something
> unpalatable like forbidding "unseen" with "one_time".

Its not that unpalatable. One_time can't be combined with some
options as it is - this would just be another one to add to the
list.

What is unpalatable is loosing messages. An MTA should never
do that.