Author: Timo Boettcher Date: To: exim-users CC: Odhiambo G. Washington Subject: Re: [exim] acl or condition to protect spam-reclassification suffixes
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
* Odhiambo G. Washington <wash@???>, Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 3:19:35 PM:
> * Timo Boettcher <spida@???> [20050208 04:07]: wrote:
>> I am trying to setup exim with dspam.
>> Since dspam can relearn misscalssified spam/ham if it is piped to a
>> command, I want to offer that possibility via per-user suffixes like
>> user-spam@foo user-ham@foo...
>> My problem: how can I keep external users (spammers) from sending
>> their spam first to my user-nospam@foo, and then to the user@foo
>> himself? > The above two will NOT do anything to the user's dictionary,
> since dspam will not have seen those e-mails previously! Ok, so the spammer sends the message, to user@, then to user-ham@, and
then again to user@... that way, it will have seen the message,
relearn it as ham, and deliver the excat same message when it arrives
next time...
> Use a condition on those two routers. That condition should
> determine two situations:
> 1. that the mail originated from a host within your +relay_from_hosts OR
> 2. the sender was authenticated (if the mail is not from a host in (1)) so, ok, that way two of my users can still influence each others
filter-settings...
