Re: [exim] Report of new spam technique

Bill Hacker wrote:

> Ergo, the article(s) still look(s) like sensationalism and FUD to me.

Couldn't agree more.


> But I remain paranoid enough to ask 'what have I missed', what do we
> need to now change // make sure we have already changed // do not forget
> to check ..... to stop such a risk?

As far as I can tell, just the same as we already are doing :)


Matt