Autor: Matt Data: A: exim Assumpte: Re: [exim] Report of new spam technique
Bill Hacker wrote:
> Ergo, the article(s) still look(s) like sensationalism and FUD to me.
Couldn't agree more.
> But I remain paranoid enough to ask 'what have I missed', what do we
> need to now change // make sure we have already changed // do not forget
> to check ..... to stop such a risk?
As far as I can tell, just the same as we already are doing :)