Re: [exim] router "unseen", and headers_add

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jeremy Harris
Date:  
To: Bill Hacker
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] router "unseen", and headers_add
Bill Hacker wrote:
> Jeremy Harris wrote:
>
>> Version 4.43
>>
>> I'm setting up headers_add in router "A", doing an unseen delivery in
>> router "B" then a real delivery in router "C". The real delivery
>> doesn't seem to get the headers added. Is this expected?
>>
>> I've observed it with "exim -bd -d-all+router+transport"
>> and the sequence seems correct.
>>
>> The unseen delivery gets them correctly. If I disable "B"
>> the the real deliver gets them correctly.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>     Jeremy

>>
>
> You did not specify if the conditions are such that the message does /
> does not
> always transit all three (i.e. - arrive at 'C').


The message transits all three routers. Sorry that wasn't clear.

>
> What happens if you add the headers only in 'C'?


It would expect it to work; I'm adding another header there and it
appears correctly. However, I'm wanting to add headers in the
first router, for ease of programming.

Thanks,
    Jeremy