Re: [exim] check_helo_slow?

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: David
Date:  
To: Giuliano Gavazzi
CC: exim-users, j2
Subject: Re: [exim] check_helo_slow?
Hi !!

> First of all in this case the order does not matter (conditions in a
> deny are ANDed, and AND is commutative); second these conditions have no
> side-effects, so you can place them as you like.


well, the result is the same, but order could matter, i would expect
that the first condition is evaluated first and that evaluation stops
as soon as a condition fails, so i always put the more time consuming
or cpu intensive conditions at the end and the fasters ones first. This
is not the case with this acl, but when you mix db lookups, dns lookups
and simple comditions and *if* exim works as i expect, is always
better to put simple conditions first and lookups and other expensive
conditions at the end


--
Best regards ...

----------------------------------------------------------------
    David Saez Padros                http://www.ols.es
    On-Line Services 2000 S.L.       e-mail  david@???
    Pintor Vayreda 1                 telf    +34 902 50 29 75
    08184 Palau-Solita i Plegamans   movil   +34 670 35 27 53
----------------------------------------------------------------