Jerry Bell wrote:
> If you are really really concerned about this and have some money to
> spend, I would recommend using Havenco. They pride themselves on being
> out of reach of governments.
They are not (out of reach).
> Certainly, it is still possible that someone
> would be able to intercept communications to them, after all, they have to
> get their Internet connections from some place.
>
Primarily the UK.....
Which requires monitoring access to all cross-border communications, per
Act of Parliament (1921, IIRC).
Bill Hacker
> Even so, requiring most or all communications to be encrypted is a prudent
> measure.
>
> Jerry
> http://www.syslog.org
>
>
>>Marc Perkel wrote:
>>
>>
>>>So - who thinks this idea will/won't work? And if it won't work - why
>>>not?
>>
>>
>> Very few things are outside the reach of certain governments. It would
>>need to be secured from pillar to post.
>>
>> Also, there is the basic concept that if someone can create something,
>>someone else can break it. As always, you can make a task harder, but
>>never impossible.
>>
>>
>>Matt
>>
>>--
>>## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim
>>details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>>
>
>
>
>
