On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 08:19 -0500, Marc Sherman wrote:
> Has anyone ever implemented BATV[0] in exim config? It seems to me like
> it would (mostly) solve the same problems as SPF, at least from the
> senders point of view, without requiring the involvement of any other
> servers to be effective.
>
> [0] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-levine-mass-batv-00.txt
>
> If anyone's got a working implementation, or documentation of how that
> kind of thing could be done in exim config, or for that matter a reason
> to beleive it can't be done, I'd be interested to know.
See
http://david.woodhou.se/eximconf/include/routers-ses and the
slightly older version and explanation at
http://woodhou.se/rpr.html
It predates BATV so doesn't precisely match the format of localparts it
uses, but it does basically the same thing.
--
dwmw2
