Re: [exim] SPF Question

David Woodhouse wrote:

>>So - am I missing something here or is SPF broken and if so - why are we
>>interested in it?
>>
>>
>
>It's broken. We're not interested in it. Except perhaps to help educate
>those who jump on the bandwagon without really thinking it through and
>realising the fundamental brokenness of it. :)
>
>
>
OK - I suppose if they looked at all the received headers and if any
matched the SPF record then maybe it would be at least partially useful?
Is there anything about SPF that is useful? I'm looking for ne tricks
and this looks like a dead end to me.