Rick Cooper wrote:
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: exim-users-bounces@??? [mailto:exim-users-bounces@exim.org]On
>>Behalf Of R.B. (Rick)
>>Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 8:34 AM
>>To: exim-users@???
>>Subject: [exim] temporarily rejected RCPT from my ISP relay MTAs
>>
>>
>>Hi all,
>>i've a problem with ISP MTAs... i have thousand of these logs line per
>>minute:
>>
>>2004-12-30 14:25:20 H=(big-1c.inet.it) [213.92.5.8]
>>F=<qjgehyk@???> temporarily rejected RCPT
>><hatbox@???>: Could not complete sender verify
>>2004-12-30 14:25:20 H=(fe-3a.inet.it) [213.92.5.105]
>>F=<czamjneafa@???> temporarily rejected RCPT
>><etnean@???>: Could not complete sender verify
>>2004-12-30 14:25:20 H=(big-1c.inet.it) [213.92.5.8]
>>F=<qjgehyk@???> temporarily rejected RCPT
>><armys@???>: Could not complete sender verify
>>2004-12-30 14:25:20 H=(fe-3a.inet.it) [213.92.5.105]
>>F=<czamjneafa@???> temporarily rejected RCPT
>><bair@???>: Could not complete sender verify
>>2004-12-30 14:25:20 H=(fe-3a.inet.it) [213.92.5.105]
>>F=<czamjneafa@???> temporarily rejected RCPT
>><adlewis@???>: Could not complete sender verify
>>2004-12-30 14:25:20 H=(fe-3a.inet.it) [213.92.5.105]
>>F=<czamjneafa@???> temporarily rejected RCPT
>><araiva@???>: Could not complete sender verify
>>
>>This, i think, is due to spammers that send directly to secondary MXs...
>>how can i avoid to respond temporarily reject on DNS problems and return
>>instead a permanent error?
>>
>>
>>
>
>Well the first thing I see:
>The mx records for buffymail.com point to nullmx.domainmanager.com which
>resolves to 0.0.0.0
>
>The mx records for passengers.com point to localhost.fabulous.com which
>resolves to 127.0.0.1
>
>both of which are invalid and exim will never be able to verify sender. I
>also noted that the helo host is listed as a free mail server, which may
>well explain why you are having troubles with mail originating from there.
>
>Are these thousands of lines from same/similar email addresses and/or the
>same .inet.it?
>
>Rick
>
>
>
>
Are always from .inet.it (my secondary MXs....)...
I think that they take that msgs in queue because i respond a temporary
error (rightly...)...and i would respond with a permanent error instead.
Thanks
Rick
