Re: [exim] Slightly wrong HELO

John W. Baxter wrote:
> Hmmm...I guess this would-be spammer wants to cover all the bases:
>
> 2004-12-23 11:34:30 rejected HELO from [221.12.13.154]:3146
> I=[172.21.2.6]:25: syntactically invalid argument(s):
> sina.com,tom.com,163.com,sina.com.cn,yahoo.com,yahoo.com.cn,hotmail.com,msn.
> com,sohu.com,126.com,china.com,qq.com

Funny. Maybe they were using : for seperation and this idiot used a , ?? =)

I've wondered something, about helo. I thought about locking each IP to the
HELO they first used when they contact my system. If it changes, lock out
the IP until the admin views it. I know of some who want to HELO as the
domain they are sending from in a multi domain setup.

--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals