Re: [exim] Using statvfs instead of statfs on Linux

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Andreas Metzler
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Using statvfs instead of statfs on Linux
On 2004-12-14 Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@???> wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 12:49 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > b) "getconf LFS_CFLAGS" is a glibc-ism


> no, it's not, it's what the Large File Summit decided was the standard
> way of finding the flags needed for compiling C programs which needs to
> support large files (back in 1996!). they also need to be linked with
> whatever is named by $(getconf LFS_LDFLAGS).


Hello,
Thanks for this information I had no idea about that, I just looked
whether it was documented in POSIX (even as optional extension) and
when it wasn't I thought "glibc-ism".
                cu andreas
-- 
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"