I just had another thought on the subject. We are not running exiscan
but the recipient end is, could that have something to do with it?
On 7 Dec 2004, at 10:41, Tom Kistner wrote:
> Steve Sargent wrote:
>
>> I have recently upgraded our mail relays from exim V4.14 to V4.43 and
>> a problem with long 550 responses seems to be happening.
>> The problem seems to be in deliver.c when the receiving host sends a
>> very long 550 response.
>
> Plain exiscan-acl does not patch deliver.c (only the BMI code does,
> but I guess this is not involved here).
>
> To avoid confusion: The remote side is using exiscan, and is packing
> the SA report into the 550 response. SA reports can be huge, up to
> multiple kilobytes, so I would call this insane. Still there seems to
> be a bug, but I guess it's not exiscan-related (since my code does not
> deal with remote responses).
>
>> deny message = Content examination found this message \
>> to be spam.\nSpam score: $spam_score\n$spam_report
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> Ouch!
>
> Philip, I could check for this bug since I'm currently testing anyway.
>
> /tom
>
>
--
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------.
| Steve Sargent, Vox +44 020 7882 3220, Fax +44 020 8980 2001
|
| QMUL Computing Services, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
|
| Email : S.L.Sargent@???
|
| WWW page: http://www.qmul.ac.uk/~cgaa160/index.html
|
|
|
| PIPER
_|_ |
| PA28R
____/___\___ |
|
___________[=o=]___________ |
| ARROW
e/ o \e |
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------.
