On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Tim Wilde wrote:
> Any chance of a patch against 4.43 that addresses this (or a ballpark idea
> when to expect 4.44)? We have an application we really need to have callouts
> enabled for in this situation. Thanks for your help.
The fix is in the snapshot in
ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/Testing/exim-snapshot.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/Testing/exim-snapshot.tar.gz.sig
The patch is below.
Regards,
Philip
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
*** exim-4.43/src/verify.c Tue Oct 5 09:32:08 2004
--- verify.c Fri Nov 12 16:23:13 2004
***************
*** 1015,1028 ****
else
{
uschar *canonical_name;
! host_item *host;
host_build_hostlist(&host_list, s, tf.hosts_randomize);
/* Just ignore failures to find a host address. If we don't manage
! to find any addresses, the callout will defer. */
! for (host = host_list; host != NULL; host = host->next)
{
if (tf.gethostbyname || string_is_ip_address(host->name, NULL))
(void)host_find_byname(host, NULL, &canonical_name, TRUE);
else
--- 1037,1054 ----
else
{
uschar *canonical_name;
! host_item *host, *nexthost;
host_build_hostlist(&host_list, s, tf.hosts_randomize);
/* Just ignore failures to find a host address. If we don't manage
! to find any addresses, the callout will defer. Note that more than
! one address may be found for a single host, which will result in
! additional host items being inserted into the chain. Hence we must
! save the next host first. */
! for (host = host_list; host != NULL; host = nexthost)
{
+ nexthost = host->next;
if (tf.gethostbyname || string_is_ip_address(host->name, NULL))
(void)host_find_byname(host, NULL, &canonical_name, TRUE);
else
