Re: [exim] sender_verify followup idea

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Kelley Reynolds
CC: Lists - Exim
Subject: Re: [exim] sender_verify followup idea
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Kelley Reynolds wrote:

> maybe have a defer_false option so that if it defers, it returns false instead of deferring. That's probably much easier and is all I'd need.


defer_ok and callout_defer_ok options already exist.

It would seem highly dangerous to implement defer_not_ok etc (which is
what you seem to be asking for). That would start rejecting messages if
(for example) your database happened to be offline for a moment.

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book:    http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book