On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, John W. Baxter wrote:
> On the other hand, it seems dangerous to add a new check to an existing
> verification (verify = header_syntax) unconditionally, since it is a
> behavior change.
True, but this is one of those difficult cases where in principle you
are quite right, but in practice I kind of feel this change is unlikely
to catch many people. I may regret having said that.
> Either adding extended syntax (per some other recent additions) (eg verify =
> header_syntax/feature,feature) or adding a different verify = xxx would seem
> safer.
Indeed, but my current feeling is that in this case the risk is low.
However, I may have changed my mind if I think about this some more...
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
