Hi
> > However, exim didn't detect an error when loading, even worse, IT USED
> > THE WRONG TRANSPORT silently...
> That seems unbelievable. Have you got evidence to prove this?
I will try to find prove.
But I am already sure, I got both mails.
> > Or is there a maximum length for router/transport names?
> > If so, why is there no warning about two equally named transports?
> There should be such a warning. When I test this, I do get a warning like this:
Right. I ment for the case of maximum lengths only. It had though, if there
was a limit of say 8, both names would have been identical.