On 11/5/2004 14:30, "Giuliano Gavazzi" <eximlists@???> wrote:
> At 6:55 pm -0200 2004/11/05, Silmar A. Marca wrote:
>> I sujest the check for adsl name...
>>
>> #-BLK: Reverso contem "adsl" e a validação de Helo não confere
>> acl_check_mail:
>>
>> drop message = ADSL and
>> $sender_helo_name not is $sender_host_address
>> condition = ${if match {$sender_host_name}{dsl}{1}{0}}
>> condition = ${if match {${lookup
>> dnsdb{a=$sender_helo_name}{$value}{}}} \
>> {$sender_host_address} \
>> {false}{true}}
>> delay = 60s
>
> I am sorry to say that, but this a bit excessive.
> I understand that fortunately you are applying
> this only to hosts that do not HELO with their
> FQDN but, still, you are suggesting to drop
> messages from hosts which contain "dsl" in their
> FQDN (that is, they have a correctly setup DNS
> but happen to have that string in their domain).
> Isn't this a bit too harsh?
> (I do a similar check but limit myself to giving
> points for it, and delay consequently)
>
For example, it would be a little hard on the folks at
hotpadslimited.com
(which didn't exist just now when I looked).
So...there's potential hobby business. ;-)
--John
