Re: [exim] Is there and logical reason to reject mail from: …

In this case the process never get to the rcpt to: phase as the mail
from: <> is rejected before you get that far.

David Brodbeck wrote:

>
>There's also no valid excuse for sending mail with an empty return path to a
>mailbox that is never used as an envelope sender. So I'd say it's pretty
>much a wash.
>
>Assuming postmaster doesn't send mail, any *legitimate* message to
>postmaster would be from a real person, and so would have a valid return
>address.
>
>
>