first big THX for fast help ...
The problem now is this:
.. cannot find router driver "redirect" in Line 419
The rest of configuration seems to be ok for exim-3.35. What to do??
Exists no redirect driver in exim-3.35? I think I have to write a litte
like this:
redirect:
driver ...
...
But where to place?
thx & cya
Lars
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> * Lars Nixdorf <lars.nixdorf@???> [20040927 15:14]: wrote:
>
>>Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>>
>>
>>>* Lars Nixdorf <lars.nixdorf@???> [20040927 01:38]: wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>hi,
>>>>
>>>>i want to control where emails users could be sent. some users should
>>>>only sent email to local users, and some to the internet too. How to
>>>>configure this ???
>>>
>>>
>>>This has been discussed before, and is probably a FAQ. Check the Exim
>>>FAQ.
>>>
>>
>>thx. i read the whole faq. and i find this (first router entry):
>
>
>
> Here is the way I see it. See the comments.
>
>
>>check_out:
>> driver = redirect
>
> # Don't run this router for the domainlist named local_domains
>
>> domains = ! +local_domains
>
> # Don't run this router for the null sender as well as the senders
> # listed in /etc/permitted/senders
>
>> senders = ! : ! lsearch;/etc/permitted/senders
>
> # If this router does not succeed, allow the mail to fail
>
>
>> allow_fail
>
> # Send the data below as the failure message to the sender
>
>
>> data = :fail: you are not allowed to send outside
>
>
>
>>I think it solved the problem, but what means this ...
>
>
> It will not solve your problem. Why?
>
>
>>! : ! --> in sender entry ??
>>
>>And it is conform to exim 3.35??
>
>
> Because the rule format is only compatible with Exim 4.x
>
> You should upgrade.
>
>
> -Wash
>
> http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
>
> --
> +======================================================================+
> |\ _,,,---,,_ | Odhiambo Washington <wash@???>
> Zzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ | Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com
> |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'| Tel: +254 20 313985-9 +254 20 313922
> '---''(_/--' `-'\_) | GSM: +254 722 743223 +254 733 744121
> +======================================================================+
> "In short, _?N is Richardian if, and only if, _?N is not Richardian."
>
