Re: [exim] Unrouteable address

Góra strony
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: John W. Baxter
Data:  
Dla: exim-users
Temat: Re: [exim] Unrouteable address
On 9/23/2004 19:04, "Luc Saffre" <luc.saffre@???> wrote:

> I am using latest Debian/testing, trying to make exim4 and mailman work.
> Exim itself seems to work (at least I receive mails to
> luc@???). I created a list "pesamunad" with mailman, this
> list is visible through Mailman's web interface.
>
> But it doesn't work. When any member sends something to this list, there is
> the following error in /etc/log/exim4/mainlog :
>
>> 2004-09-24 04:13:12 H=mta2.mail.neti.ee (MXR-7.estpak.ee)
> [194.126.101.111] F=<ly.rumma@???> rejected RCPT
> <pesamunad@???>: Unrouteable address
>
> I think I did everything as instructed in the document "Using mailman 2.1
> lists with exim4" (http://www.exim.org/howto/mailman21.html). Although there
> is one problem: at some place it says :
>
>> The router should be placed in the router section
>> (ie somewhere after the "begin routers" line of your config file).
>
> but in my exim.conf I cannot find the words "begin routers". There is the
> following comment instead:
>
> ######################################################################
> #                      ROUTERS CONFIGURATION                         #
> #            Specifies how remote addresses are handled              #
> ######################################################################
> #                          ORDER DOES MATTER                         #
> #  A remote address is passed to each in turn until it is accepted.  #
> ######################################################################

>
> Anyway, adding a "begin routers" line near this comment did not change
> anything.
>
> Any ideas what I can try next?


So far, it looks as if you're showing us an Exim 3 (or even older)
configuration file. Is there
end
on a line by itself just above that comment?

Someone who uses Debian will have to take it from there--Debian is too
confusing for a non-Debianist, despite its good qualities.

--John