Hi !!
> It's it's undeserved bounces you want to get rid of, SPF doesn't help
> much either
spf is not the panacea, nor focused in avoiding undeserved bounces.
> there really aren't that many people rejecting mail for
> an SPF 'fail' result, because they'd have too many false rejections that
> way.
have you tried it ? we are rejecting spf fail with no false
rejections, in fact both concepts are totally oposed: a domain
owner who tells others that nobody could use it's domain in the
mailfrom except him is exposing a clear policy, there is no place
to false rejections. Of course there are very little people
publishing spf records that way.
> If you want to stop receiving bounces to mail you didn't send, try
> SES/BATV. You don't need anybody else to participate for that; you don't
> need the whole world to upgrade.
you could also check the message body for a special header added
by your mta and reject any bounce without that header, but at the
end all methods have they own problems.
--
Best regards ...
----------------------------------------------------------------
David Saez Padros http://www.ols.es
On-Line Services 2000 S.L. e-mail david@???
Pintor Vayreda 1 telf +34 902 50 29 75
08184 Palau-Solita i Plegamans movil +34 670 35 27 53
----------------------------------------------------------------
