Re: [exim] Thanks for all your input

Jon Kyme <jrk@???> wrote:
> peter@??? wrote:
>
>> The reverse-path of the previous message
>> (perhaps 'ownerlistname@???')
>> might be subject to alias expansion somewhere, and result in more
>> than 1 recipient
>
> Indeed, but should it be? "notifications about a previous
> message,[...] are sent to the reverse-path of the previous mail
> message" seems to preclude aliasing to some long list of RCPTs
> without supplying a new return-path.

It gets addressed to the orginal return-path on the server where the NDR is
generated, but the alias expansion happens on delivery to another server.

Peter