On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 08:47:04PM +0200, Giuliano Gavazzi said:
> At 2:22 pm -0400 2004/09/19, Stephen Gran wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >I am presently working on greylisting, and I have it working, but it is
> >not doing exactly what I would like. I am using this acl fragment:
> >
> > warn set acl_m1 = ${readsocket{/var/run/greylist/exim_sockd.sock}\
> > {GREYLIST ${lc:$sender_address}
> >${lc:$local_part@$domain} $sender_host_address}{3s}{\n}{0}}
> > hosts = ! +no_check_hosts
> > !senders = :
> [...]
>
> this way acl_m1 is set in any case so the subsequent lines have no effect.
> Instead if you write:
>
>
> warn hosts = !...
> !senders = : (but can't you be more consistent...)
:)
> set acl_m1 = ....
>
> the last line is evaluated only is the first two are true.
Yes, that is smarter. I hadn't thought of it that way - I was for some
reason seeing the whole warn block as a piece, and not thinking about
the internal ordering of lines. Thanks for the cluebat.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Stephen Gran | It pays in England to be a |
| steve@??? | revolutionary and a bible-smacker most |
| http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | of one's life and then come round. -- |
| | Lord Alfred Douglas |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
