Re: [exim] Thanks for all your input

peter@??? wrote:

>The reverse-path of the previous message
>(perhaps 'ownerlistname@???')
>might be subject to alias expansion somewhere, and result in more
>than 1 recipient

Indeed, but should it be? "notifications about a previous message,[...] are
sent to the reverse-path of the previous mail message" seems to preclude
aliasing to some long list of RCPTs without supplying a new return-path.