On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 14:42 +0100, Sean Hoggard wrote:
> Thanks for the advice, I did wonder if this might be the case, I'm
> afraid I do need to bounce messages though, my spam filter sometimes
> identifies mails as spam when they are genuine, in this case the
> sender needs to know there is a problem.
>
> Most spam messages have false addresses anyway, it's usually virus
> infected mails that sometimes have forged addresses in and I don't
> bounce those messages.
This is why you *must* reject them at SMTP time. Sending out bounces
later probably breaks the computer misuse act.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
