Re: [exim] Let the 'postmaster' callout option be damned

Página Principal
Apagar esta mensagem
Responder a esta mensagem
Autor: Tony Finch
Data:  
Para: Philip Hazel
CC: exim-users
Assunto: Re: [exim] Let the 'postmaster' callout option be damned
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, David Woodhouse wrote:

> On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 11:43 +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
> > On a matter of technical detail: I don't think it should be a global
> > option (in the Exim 3 style). It should, if implemented, be another
> > sub-option of the "callout" option in the ACL.
> >
> >     verify = sender/callout,postmaster,postmaster_sender=xxxx

>
> For some reason I thought you'd already implemented this and went to
> look for it so I could re-enable postmaster callouts now I've upgraded
> all my boxes to Exim 4.42. But it's not there.
>
> Please could you add it to the wishlist?


It'd be slightly nicer if the postmaster_sender option implied the
postmaster option.

There's a similar problem with verify=header_sender. It's incorrect to
assume that addresses in headers are valid bounce addresses. I'd like an
option to specify the callout return path in this case. This is safe,
because so long as bounce address callout verification uses a null return
path a callout loop will not occur.

Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot@???> http://dotat.at/
WHITBY TO THE WASH: SOUTHWEST 6 TO GALE 8 VEERING WEST LATER. SCATTERED
SHOWERS. GOOD OR MODERATE. MODERATE TO ROUGH, LOCALLY SLIGHT.