On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 10:04:11PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote the following:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 12:03:38AM -0500, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 02:35:19PM +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote the following:
> > > On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:54:36 -0500, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr.
> > > <jnagyjr@???> wrote:
> > > > OT: I'm tired of the list rejecting my PGP/SMIME signed messages.
> > > The list probably doesn't care who you are.
> > > Bad list.
> > Perhaps, but I'm sure there are others who do.
> > And yes, I know changing the subject doesn't start a new thread.
>
> I hope, then, that you are not one of these lusers who PGP sign everything
> but whose PGP keys are not available on the keyservers, and who don't
> understand the trust model. I'm fed up of being on lists filled with such
> lusers. And can I possibly introduce you to GPG's --clearsign option, and
> the equivalent for PGP?
>
> Cheers
>
> MBM
My key is available, but yes, I do sign everything. I have mutt set to that
behavior for default. I know of GPG's --clearsign option, but that isn't the
proper way to sign emails according to rfc2015[0]. It's nice to know though
that I'm a luser because I choose to sign my emails.
[0]: <
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2015.txt >
--
AIM: pres CTHULHU | ICQ: 18115568 | Yahoo: pagan_prince
Jabber: DarkKnightRadick@(jabber.org|amessage.at) | Libertarian @ Large
PGP: 0x642F7BDA | <
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tennesseans-for-badnarik/ >
<
http://mc-luug.homelinux.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-luug >
