On 2004-08-29 Nigel Metheringham <nigel.metheringham@???> wrote:
> Philip Hazel wrote:
>> True. The solution is to send the signed document as an attachment.
>> Unfortunately, the Exim lists do not permit attachments...
> I could change this. The reason for the original policy was that
> messages with attachments really didn't work in the web archives.
> However if the archiver is happy with it (or I could change to a
> different archiver easily enough - theres only a week of archives in the
> current one).
> Is there a demand for this?
Yes, I'd like to see that (of course still with a sane message size
limit). - I occassionally would like to use PGP/MIME.
cu andreas
--
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"
