Autor: Mollatt Ntini Data: A: Alan J. Flavell, Exim users list Assumpte: Re: [Exim] 550 Administrative prohibition
From: "Alan J. Flavell" <a.flavell@???>
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote:
>
> > > > 550 Administrative prohibition
>
> > Can we have some way to include more detail in such responses?
>
> In some contexts, we already have a way. I think Philip not
> unreasonably assumed that the default should be one which did not
> "give much away" to spammers and other low-life[1]. Those who want to
> send more detail have to take some positive action to get it.
>
> My comment on our main-configuration entry:
>
> smtp_return_error_details = true
It sure did, some very interesting stuff to read as well
>
> [1] It's left as an exercise to the student to determine whether this
> term includes senders who misconfigure their mail software... ;-}
>
> --